TripleO Ceph Client¶
Native Ansible roles for TripleO integration with Ceph clusters.
Starting in the Octopus release, Ceph has its own day1 tool called cephadm 1 and it’s own day2 tool called orchestrator 2 which will replace ceph-ansible 3. While ceph-ansible had the necessary features to configure Ceph clients, distributing for example config file and keyrings as necessary on nodes which aren’t members of the Ceph cluster, neither cephadm or the orchestrator will manage Ceph clients configuration.
Goal is to create some new ansible roles in TripleO to perform the Ceph clients (Nova, Cinder, Glance, Manila) configuration, which is of special importance in TripleO to support deployment scenarios where the Ceph cluster is externally managed, not controlled by the undercloud, yet the OpenStack services configuration remains a responsibility of TripleO.
Introduce a new role into tripleo-ansible for Ceph client configuration.
The new role will:
Configure OpenStack services as clients of an external Ceph cluster (in the case of collocation, the ceph cluster is still logically external)
Provide Ceph configuration files and cephx keys for OpenStack clients of RBD and CephFS (Nova, Cinder, Glance, Manila)
Full multiclient support, e.g. one OpenStack deployment may use multiple Ceph clusters, e.g. multibackend Glance
Configure clients quickly, e.g. generate the key in one place and copy it efficiently
This is a standalone role which is reusable to configure OpenStack against an externally managed Ceph cluster
Not break existing support for CephExternalMultiConfig which is used for configuring OpenStack to work with more than one Ceph cluster when deploying Ceph in DCN environments (Deployment of dashboard on DCN sites is not in scope with this proposal).
Support for clients configuration might be added in future versions of cephadm, yet there are some reasons why we won’t be able to use this feature as-is even if it was available today:
it assumes the for the cephadm tool to be configured with admin privileges for the external Ceph cluster, which we don’t have when Ceph is not managed by TripleO;
it also assumes that each and every client node has been provisioned into the external Ceph orchestrator inventory so that evey Ceph MON is able to log into the client node (overcloud nodes) via SSH;
while offering the necessary functionalities to copy the config files and cephx keyrings over to remote client nodes, it won’t be able to configure for example Nova with the libvirtd secret for qemu-kvm, which is a task only relevant when the client is OpenStack;
None derived directly from the decision to create new ansible roles. The distribution of the cephx keyrings itself though should be implemented using a TripleO service, like the existing CephClient service, so that keyrings are only deployed on those nodes which actually need those.
The goal is to preserve and reuse any existing Heat parameter which is currently consumed to drive ceph-ansible; from operators’ perspective the problem of configuring a Ceph client isn’t changed and there shouldn’t be a need to change the existing parameters, it’s just the implementation which will change.
As described in the Proposed Change section, the purpose of this role is to proper configure clients and it allows OpenStack services to connect to an internal or external Ceph cluster, as well as multiple Ceph cluster in a DCN context. Since both config files and keys are necessary for many OpenStack services (Nova, Cinder, Glance, Manila) to make them able to properly interact with the Ceph cluster, at least two actions should be performed:
generate keys in one place
copy the generated keys efficiently
The ceph_client role should be very small, and a first improvement in terms of performances can be found on key generation since they are created in one, centralized place. The generated keys, then, just need to be distributed across the nodes of the Ceph cluster, as well as the Ceph cluster config file. Adding this role to tripleo-ansible avoid adding an extra calls from a pure deployment perspective; in fact, no additional ansible playbooks will be triggered and we expect to see performances improved since no additional layers are involved here.
How Ceph is deployed could change for anyone maintaining TripleO code for OpenStack services which use Ceph. In theory there should be no change as the CephClient service will still configure the Ceph configuration and Ceph key files in the same locations. Those developers will just need to switch to the new templates when they are stable.
The new role should be enabled by a TripleO service, like it happens today with the CephClient service. Depending on the environment file chosen at deployment time, the actual implementation of such a service could either be based on ceph-ansible or on the new role.
When the Ceph cluster is not external, the role will also create pools and the cephx keyrings into the Ceph cluster; these steps will be skipped instead when Ceph is external precisely because we won’t have admin privileges to change the cluster configuration in that case.
TripleO Heat Templates¶
The existing implementation which depends on ceph-ansible will remain in-tree for at least 1 deprecation cycle. By reusing the existing Heat input parameters we should be able to transparently make the clients configuration happen with ceph-ansible or the new role just by switching the environment file used at deployment time. TripleO users who currently use environments/ceph-ansible/ceph-ansible-external.yaml in order to have their Overcloud use an existing Ceph cluster, should be able to apply the same templates to the new template for configuring Ceph clients, e.g. environments/ceph-client.yaml. This will result in the new tripleo-ansible/roles/ceph_client role being executed.
OpenStack W: start tripleo-ansible/roles/ceph_client as experimental and then set it as default in scenarios 001/004. We expect to to become stable during the W cycle.
The ceph_client role will be added in tripleo-ansible and allow configuring the OpenStack services as clients of an external or TripleO managed Ceph cluster; no new dependencies are added for tripleo-ansible project. The ceph_client role will work with External Ceph, Internal Ceph deployed by ceph-ansible, and the Ceph deployment described in 4.
It should be possible to reconfigure one of the existing CI scenarios already deploying with Ceph to use the newer ceph_client role, making it non-voting until the code is stable. Then switch the other existing CI scenario to it.
No doc changes should be needed.