There are some Oslo-specific aspects to being the Oslo PTL. This document is a place to capture those for future reference.
Each PTL learns things about the position during the time in which they serve it. However, historically they’ve kept private notes that had to be passed along from PTL to PTL, which is not ideal. First, if the handoff doesn’t happen for any reason, the new PTL will have to start over from scratch. Second, it makes these notes hidden from public view, which is not useful for potential future PTL candidates.
This should be a living document that is updated by PTLs as they discover new best practices and tips for leading the Oslo project.
A new or future PTL should first read the Project Team Guide PTL Document. It contains a wealth of useful information that a PTL should know. Pay particular attention to the parts about delegating.
In general, the PTL or release liaison should propose releases for all Oslo libraries that need one weekly. Generally this is done early in the week, and releasing on Friday is avoided when possible to avoid anyone having to work the weekend to fix a breakage. If a critical fix needs to be released immediately, it does not have to wait for the regular weekly release cycle. The intent of the weekly cycle is to ensure changes get released in a timely fashion, not to prevent anything from being released.
Exceptions to the weekly release schedule can be made at the discretion of the PTL. Releasing immediately before a holiday when most of the team will not be around is not ideal. It is also a good idea to wait to release master after a new stable branch has been cut until the release associated with the stable branch has shipped. This allows backports of things like dependency bumps in case bugs are found during final testing of an OpenStack release. In that case, a minor version bump would be needed and if master has already been released then that minor version will already be taken.
In general, minor version changes are not allowed on stable branches, but exceptions can be made if the situation warrants it. See the stable branch guide for more details.
When making releases, there are some useful commands to know. First, to find all the changes in all the Oslo libraries since they were last released, use the following commands in the openstack/releases repo:
./tools/list_unreleased_changes.sh master $(.tox/venv/bin/list-deliverables --team oslo -r) ./tools/list_unreleased_changes.sh master $(.tox/venv/bin/list-deliverables --team oslo -r --series independent)
These commands assume that the
venv tox environment has been
created. That can be done with the command
tox -e venv --notest
Oslo contains both libraries that are tied to the OpenStack release as well as some that are independent of it. That’s why two commands are needed to cover all of them.
To do the same for a stable branch, use the following (replace the branch names as appropriate):
./tools/list_unreleased_changes.sh stable/train $(.tox/venv/bin/list-deliverables --team oslo -r --series train)
The Oslo team typically meets weekly. The specific day and time can be found on the eavesdrop page. The PTL normally chairs the meeting, but other contributors can also do so if desired or needed. The meeting agenda can be found on the wiki page. Chairing the meeting involves going through the topics in the agenda - some weeks this takes 15 minutes or less, others it takes the full hour or more.
The Oslo team uses a courtesy ping list in the meeting agenda template so regular meeting attendees can be reminded of the start of the meeting. Attendees can add or remove their names as desired and the person running the weekly meeting should copy the ping list into IRC so everyone on the list gets a notification.
Weekly Wayward Review¶
This meeting topic requires a bit more explanation. The idea is to find an old review and move it along in some way. This means at the end of the meeting, the review should either be approved, -1’d, or have someone assigned to follow up after the meeting.
bnemec uses reviewstats to find the oldest open reviews in Oslo.
Beginning of Cycle Activities¶
The ping list should be cleared each cycle to avoid pinging people who no longer work on Oslo. A new ping list can be created in parallel to the old one to allow contributors who want to stay on the list to sign up before the list is cleared. These parallel lists should both exist for a couple of weeks to give everyone a chance to update the new one.
When a new release name is announced, it needs to be added to the oslo.log versionutils module. See this versionutils review for an example.
At the start of each cycle, the Oslo feature freeze date should be added to the release calendar. See this feature freeze date review for an example of doing that. A detailed explanation of why Oslo has its own feature freeze can be found in the feature freeze policy.
Check the oslo-coresec group and make sure all members are active Oslo cores so private security bugs are not being sent out to people who don’t need to see them. If necessary, add current core team members to ensure that there are enough people on the coresec team to handle any security bugs that come in.
For more details on managing the coresec team, see the vulnerability management team’s requirements.
End of Cycle Activities¶
Make sure all libraries get released before non-client library freeze, even if they don’t have changes that would normally prompt a release (such as doc or test changes). This may be handled automatically by the release team now, but it’s still good to do it explicitly. It is important for all changes to be released before stable branches are cut because branches are based on the last released commit, not what was on master at the time. If there are unreleased doc or test changes they may be lost on the stable branch and need to be backported.
When doing the final release of a library for the cycle, also request to create the appropriate stable branch. For an example of doing so, see this branch creation request. In the future this can all be done in one review, but it’s a change in the previous process so there are no example reviews for that yet.
When doing a final release, you can easily include the branch creation with it by adding
--stable-branchto the new_release.sh call. For example:
./tools/new_release.sh ussuri oslo.config feature --stable-branch
PTL Handoff Activities¶
Hopefully most of these activities are automated, but one thing that needs to be done manually is to make the new PTL an administrator on the oslo-coresec group in Launchpad.
Alternatives & History¶
As discussed in the problem description, we could continue to have the Oslo PTL maintain a private set of notes that is passed individually to the next PTL. This is not preferred for the reasons mentioned there.
Writing the policy itself is the main work item. Updating it as the community evolves will be an ongoing process.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode