Active Node Creation¶
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1526315
This spec is intended to allow a slightly more permissive interaction with the ironic API to allow an operator to migrate a hardware fleet to be managed by ironic.
Problem description¶
At present the ironic API explicitly sets the new state for nodes to the beginning step in the ironic workflow.
As part of hardware fleet lifecycle management, an operator expects to be able to migrate inventory and control systems for their hardware fleet utilizing their existing inventory data and allocation records. Ultimately this means that an imported host MAY already be allocated and unavailable for immediate allocation.
For an operator of multiple distinct OpenStack infrastructures, it is reasonable to permit an operator to migrate running baremetal hosts from one “system” to another “system” that are ultimately components in a larger infrastructure, while not immediately reprovisioning hardware.
Proposed change¶
Allow an API client to transition a node directly from the MANAGEABLE
state to the ACTIVE
state, bypassing actual deployment of the node.
Creation of a new API provision_state verb of
adopt
that invokes the state transition ofADOPTING
.Creation of a new machine state transition of
ADOPTING
which is valid only in theMANAGEABLE
state and allows an operator to directly move a node toactive
state. This transition would be dependent upon a successful interface validation. Failure of this transition shall move nodes to anADOPTFAIL
which will allow users to be able to identify nodes that failed adoption.Creation of a new machine state of
ADOPTFAIL
which a machine is set to upon theADOPTING
transition failing. This state will allow a user to re-attemptADOPTING
viaadopt
, or attempt to transition the node to theMANAGEABLE
state viamanage
. Additionally, theADOPTFAIL
state will be listed in the list of states that permit node deletion from the ironic database.API client update to provide CLI interface to invoke this feature.
Creation of explicit documentation covering:
- Use cases of the feature while explicitly predicating that proper operation requires node validation to succeed. - Explicitly detail that it is the operator's responsibility to define the node with all relevant appropriate configuration else the node could fail node state provision operations of ``rebuild`` and ``delete``. Which would result in manual intervention being necessary. - Explain the basic mechanics of the use of the adoption feature to users in order to help convey the importance of the correct information being populated.
Alternatives¶
The logical alternative is to remove restrictions in what an API client posts
to allow the caller to explicitly state or invoke a node to be created in
ACTIVE
state. As the community desires full functionality of the node to
exist upon being imported along with driver interface validation, the
implementation appears to lend itself to be implemented as a state
transition instead of pure API logic.
Alternatively, we could craft operator documentation to help assist operators in directly loading nodes into the ironic database, coupled with the caveats of doing so, and require that documentation is updated in lock-step with any database schema changes.
Data model impact¶
None
State Machine Impact¶
Implementation of a new state transition from MANAGEABLE
state to
ACTIVE
state utilizing an intermediate state of ADOPTING
which
takes the following actions.
Triggering the conductor node take_over logic.
Upon completion the node state is set to
ACTIVE
.
Should a failure of take_over logic occur in the ADOPTING
state,
the node will be returned to ADOPTFAIL
state from which a user
will be able to retry the adoption operation or delete the node.
Addition of ADOPTFAIL
into the DELETE_ALLOWED_STATES
list.
REST API impact¶
Addition of a new state verb of adopt
that triggers a transition to
ADOPTING
state. This verb will be unavailable for clients invoking
an insufficient API version.
The API micro-version will need to be incremented as a result of this change.
Client (CLI) impact¶
Update of the ironicclient CLI to detail that adopt
is a possible
provision state option.
Update of the ironicclient micro-version.
RPC API impact¶
None
Driver API impact¶
None
Nova driver impact¶
None
Ramdisk impact¶
N/A
Security impact¶
None
Other end user impact¶
None
Scalability impact¶
None
Performance Impact¶
Minimal API impact will exist for a user of this feature as the creation
of nodes in ACTIVE
state will require multiple calls with the API by
any user attempting to leverage this feature.
Users performing bulk loads of hosts may find the multiple API calls somewhat problematic from the standpoint of multiple API calls to create, validate, and adopt a node, on top of API calls to poll the current state of the node before proceeding to the next step. Bulk loaders should also be congnizant of their configurations as they potentially could result in the conductors consuming disk space and network bandwidth if items need to be staged on the conductor to support the node’s normal operation.
Other deployer impact¶
Allows for an easier adoption by managers of pre-existing hardware fleets.
There is the potential that a operator could define a hardware fleet with bare minimal configuration to initially add the node to ironic. The result of which means that an operator could conceivably and inadvertently act upon a node when insufficient information is defined. This risk will be documented as part of the resulting documentation in order to help highlight the risk and help provide guidance on preventing such a possibility should a user be attempting to adopt an inventory that is already “cloudy”.
Developer impact¶
None
Implementation¶
Assignee(s)¶
- Primary assignee:
juliaashleykreger
- Other contributors:
None
Work Items¶
Conductor State Machine Changes
API microversion and update and appropriate logic
CLI node-set-provision-state option addition
Documentation updates
Dependencies¶
None
Testing¶
Addition of unit tests as well as tempest tests to explicitly test the interface.
Upgrades and Backwards Compatibility¶
This feature will not be usable by older API clients via the API micro-version interface.
Documentation Impact¶
Documentation will need to be updated to represent this new feature.
References¶
None