With the addition of passing down an auth plugin from keystonemiddleware to the services we are slowly starting to have some control over the way authentication is used in service to service communication.
As part of this we can start to add helpers to this plugin that will automatically and transparently make best practice decisions on behalf of services.
Service to Service communication is a mess. There is no standard way of initiating calls and initiatives like Service tokens and Request-IDs are only as successful as different services manually implement them.
Whilst ever these are implemented ad-hoc we will struggle to see full coverage of these features.
The features are present in keystonemiddleware and keystoneclient to start transparently adding information to Service to Service communications so that we can handle these best practices and in future add any required additional security information to these requests without having to modify every service.
We are already passing down an auth plugin to services. For clients that support using an auth plugin (which is now most and the number is growing) communicating with this service now simply involves taking the plugin from the ‘keystone.token_auth’ ENV variable auth_token middleware sets and initiating a client with that plugin.
I would like to initially add X-Service-Token to the get_headers method so that now whenever the plugin is used the Service Token (the token that is used to authenticate auth_token middleware for validation) is added to requests that go through this auth plugin. This is something that swift is doing manually today and something that barbican and other services have expressed interest in to allow them to control when a service creates a resource on behalf of a user. Having this handled automatically would mean we could rely on something like this for more advanced policy mechanisms.
This would also allow us to finally fix token binding as we would enforce a token bind only upon a service token if present.
Additionally I would like to add the X-Openstack-Request-ID header. This header is an attempt to allow better tracing of how a request flows through OpenStack. By adding it to the auth plugin new services would gain support for this request tracing with no additional effort.
The alternative is to simply leave this information under the control of individual services. New OpenStack wide initiatives will continue to be done service by service.
We will see more distribution of the Service Token. This is not necessarily inherent to this change but the concept of an X-Service-Token but as we are going to add this header to many requests that currently don’t require it this will become more widely distributed.
There is the additional cost of verifying X-Service-Tokens (regardless of token format) that will be present when they otherwise would not have been, .
There is ad-hoc support for these features already. We will want to remove them from those services once we can assure that the new systems are being adopted.
Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you’re throwing it out there to see who picks it up?
If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the primary author and contact.
The most notable work item is going to be the long term work of getting services to use the provided auth plugin rather than the per-service context management that is done today. This is a required and ongoing task regardless of this blueprint.